home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Thursday May 24, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

The Real Charlotte Simmons Churches

print view

Republicans are Regular Guys

by Christopher Chantrill
January 19, 2005 at 2:45 pm

|

CONSERVATIVES like to complain that for liberals there is no life outside politics.  Politics is their religion, their livelihood, and their politics.  They start out as student politicians in high school, and go on to make a splash in college politics.  After a triumphant spell in law school they spend a year or two on a prominent politician’s staff.  Before they are thirty, they have begun a career in elected office. 

Conservatives on the other hand avoid this monomania and live balanced, nuanced lives with everything in its place.  For religion they go to church, for livelihood they start a business.  They get married; they have children.  And for politics?  They turn to politics only after they have learned a thing or two about life. 

This is a comforting myth, but is it really true—in the best sense of myth, symbolizing a profound truth in a compact and compelling way?  Let’s take a look at our recent national leaders and see what we find.

The last time they played “Happy Days are Here Again” for the Democrats at a presidential inauguration it was January 1993, and Bill Clinton was sworn into office.  Clinton had spent his entire adult life politics.  After a jolly time in Oxford on a Rhodes Scholarship and getting a law degree from Yale in 1973 at 26 he fought and lost a campaign for Congress in 1974.  But two years later he won election as Arkansas Attorney General at the ripe old age of 30, and two years after that he was elected governor.  Ever since, until his second term as president, he was running for something or other, and enjoying every minute of it.

Clinton wasn’t the only lifelong politician leading the Democratic Party in 1993.  The majority leader in the Senate, George Mitchell graduated from Georgetown Law in 1960 at the age of 26 and served as a Senate staffer, government attorney, and U.S. District Judge until he was appointed to the Senate when Ed Muskie resigned to become Secretary of State. 

House Speaker Tom Foley was another man who had spent a life in politics.  Graduating from the University of Washington Law school in 1957 he became a deputy prosecutor in Spokane County in 1958, taught law at Gonzaga University for a couple of years before getting appointed as assistant attorney general of the State of Washington.  Then it was off to Washington, DC as a staffer on the Senate Interior Committee, and election to the House of Representatives in 1965.

So there they were, in 1993, three Democratic leaders who had never known any life but politics, ready to restore the fortunes of a Democratic Party sorely tried for twelve long years by the underestimated Ronald Reagan, radio announcer, movie actor, union leader, television presenter, who finally achieved his first political office in 1966 at the age of 55.  But in 1994 the band stopped playing “Happy Days are Here Again,” and the Republicans took control of Congress.

Ten years later there is a Republican in the White House and the Republicans are enjoying their biggest majorities in the House and Senate since 1930.

When they assemble on the rostrum in front of the U.S. Capitol on January 20, 2005, the nation’s new Republican leaders will be men who came to politics later in life.  George W. Bush is a man who spent fifteen years in business before running for governor of Texas in 1994.  He’d started an oil company, Arbusto, at the very peak of energy prices in 1980, riding the energy bust to an agonizing business failure.  Then he parlayed his political connections into a successful stint as president of the Texas Rangers.  Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist graduated from Harvard Medical School in 1978 and worked as a surgeon and director of the Vanderbilt heart and lung transplantation program.  It was 16 years before he turned to politics and won election to the U.S. Senate in 1994, becoming majority leader upon the resignation of Trent Lott.  Denny Hastert, Speaker of the House of Representatives, is perhaps the most humble of our national leaders, working as a high school teacher and coach and running his own business for 13 years until winning election to the Illinois state house in 1980.

There is one regular guy on the Democratic leadership in 2005, and she’s a woman.  The biography of Nancy Pelosi, minority leader in the House shows an embarrassing 20-year gap between graduation at Trinity College and her first admitted political job as chair of the California State Democratic Party in 1981-83. Perhaps she was busy raising her five children.  Harry Reid, minority leader in the Senate, is just another lawyer who’s spent his life in politics.  Why can’t we have a Democratic Party that looks like America?

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Liberal Coercion

[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State


Churches

[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph


Moral Imperatives of Modern Culture

These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self


Drang nach Osten

There was nothing new about the Frankish drive to the east... [let] us recall that the continuance of their rule depended upon regular, successful, predatory warfare.
Richard Fletcher, The Barbarian Conversion


Government Expenditure

The Union publishes an exact return of the amount of its taxes; I can get copies of the budgets of the four and twenty component states; but who can tell me what the citizens spend in the administration of county and township?
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America


Living Law

The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital


German Philosophy

The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since 1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be inadequate. 
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill