home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Thursday May 24, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

If Conservatives Occupied Wall Street Carry On Borking, Say Libs

print view

Subsidies Have Consequences

by Christopher Chantrill
October 20, 2011 at 2:53 pm

|

THE TROUBLE with the ruling class is that it doesn't have a clue about business. To an Obami like Jay Carney, White House press secretary, the failure of corporate crony Solyndra is “just the way business works.” You win some, you lose some.

Only, of course, the way business works is that when you lose it's supposed to be your money that gets lost. As Matthew Continetti points out, under Obamian crony capitalism with its subsidies and its loan guarantees the crony capitalist “privatizes any gain while socializing the risk.” No wonder financiers and CEOs are such enthusiastic campaign contributors. No wonder the OWS protesters are so confused.

But subsidies have consequences when it's time to start “socializing the risk.” That's what the Meltdown of 2008 was all about. Politicians had subsidized mortgage credit for decades, and when that wasn't enough they set goals and timetables to force banks to lend to unqualified buyers. Higher and higher went the real estate prices; lower and lower went the credit standards. When the whole thing flushed down the toilet the politicians and their willing apologists in the media blamed “greedy bankers” and deregulation.

Now the politicians have sent the victims of another subsidy scheme into the streets. Bigger and bigger went the college grants and loans; higher and higher went the college fees. Now the whole higher education boondoggle is about to flush down the toilet and the demonstrators say it's all about corporate greed. Graduates of liberal “studies” programs are outraged that their $50,000 in government-subsidized college debt plus $5 adds up to a meal at McDonalds.

It's not surprising that these lefties are protesting on Wall Street and blaming the Jews for everything. Jews are the paradigmatic middle-men, and Wall Streeters are just glorified peddlers. More than stock pickers or derivative wizards, Wall Streeters are in the business of flogging government debt to the widows and orphans, and to the world's pension funds: federal debt, state debt, development agency debt, school district debt, hospital, county, city--you name it, they sell it. Here's news for those naïve lefties. Wall Street didn't create all that debt. They just flogged it to the rubes, and got handsomely paid for doing the dirty work for the politicians. “Up north” in England they have a saying for that. “Where there's muck there's brass.”

Subsidies almost always end in tears. Remember the Savings and Loans? They had a special subsidy that allowed them to charge more interest than regular banks. It paid for a lot of lousy management until the Feds deregulated bank interest rates and the S&Ls started drowning in bad debt. Remember the auto companies?

Now the government wants to make a dog's breakfast of the electric utility industry with its renewables mandates. Oregon's Shepherds Flat wind farm is the poster boy for that.

The State of California now mandates 33 percent renewables for electric utilities like Socal Edison by 2020. So what does Edison do? It signs a contract to buy wind power for 20 years from Caithness Energy, owner of the Shepherd's Flat wind farm in northern Oregon. General Electric, led by friend-of-Obama CEO Jeff Immelt, is supplying the 300 odd wind turbine generators. But don't worry about SoCal Edison. Writes Robert Bryce:

The majority of the funding for the $1.9 billion, 845-megawatt Shepherds Flat wind project in Oregon is coming courtesy of federal taxpayers. And that largesse will provide a windfall for General Electric and its partners on the deal who include Google, Sumitomo, and Caithness Energy. Not only is the Energy Department giving GE and its partners a $1.06 billion loan guarantee, but as soon as GE’s 338 turbines start turning at Shepherds Flat, the Treasury Department will send the project developers a cash grant of $490 million. Google paid for a $100 million equity share in the project.

It's estimated that the investors will make 22-30 percent return on equity on the project. Corporate greed, perhaps, but who can blame them? In a couple of years this firestorm of subsidies will have done so much damage that we'll have a complete green meltdown. The politicians will turn around and blame Wall Street and the corporations for the mess. Then they will jerk the subsidies away, and everyone will cheer.

After the firestorm dies down folks like Google that build backup power to keep their server farms up 24-7 will buy the bankrupt wind farms at pennies on the dollar. They are the folks that could really use wind power—if it is almost free. Hey, that is just the way that business works!

Business is really good at doing stuff, and when the political activists are determined to force us to eat our peas, business will always be there to sell the peas to Uncle Sam and make lots of money at it.

To turn around and blame the resulting consequence on corporate personhood or corporate greed is what Big Daddy used to call “mendacity.”

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Socialism equals Animism

Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Physics, Religion, and Psychology

Paul Dirac: “When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion. However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.”
John Farrell, “The Creation Myth”


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill