home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Thursday May 24, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Riots and Civil Society Warren Buffett Shelters from Hurricane Obama

print view

Remember "No New Taxes"?

by Christopher Chantrill
August 24, 2011 at 1:25 pm

|

IT WAS INTERESTING to watch Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) talkin’ to the folks in Oakland last week. I found myself transfixed by her sophisticated blend of hand gestures, ranging from the one-finger point, the two-finger jab, and the full-hand chop.

Listen, she told them, explaining her vote for the debt-ceiling bill. “Here’s what we got. We got no Cuts in Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.” Then the camera cut away to a group of rent-a-victims holding signs: “Taxes Save Lives” said one; “Cuts Kill” and “Tax the Rich” said others. Where do the community organizers find these people?

All we need now is President Obama addressing the 2012 Democratic National Convention to thunderous applause: “Let me be clear. No New Cuts!”

Back when President George H.W. Bush reneged on his “No New Taxes” pledge Americans still dwelt in the budgetary Garden of Eden. In 1990, in the existential crisis that required a balanced deficit-reduction package of tax increases right in the middle of a recession, the US federal debt was only 55 percent of GDP, according to usgovernmentspending.com.

There is no doubt the tax-increase package worked. It slowed down the economy just enough to let Candidate Clinton claim in 1992 that the US had the “worst economy in the last 50 years.”

But now, after a run of bad luck, the US debt is up to 100 percent of GDP, unemployment is 9.1 percent of the work force, and it’s just a matter of time before the Cuts begin.

I wonder, as the president would say, what “folks” in the Democratic Party leadership will be “thinkin’” when the Cuts do begin? Wouldn’t they be thinkin’: now I know how Bush the elder felt after reneging on No New Taxes?

And if the Cuts do begin won’t it lead to a split in the Democratic Party and a Third Party progressive candidate? We’ve had two elections recently, 1992 and 2008, where the GOP voters were clearly in the mood to teach their party a lesson. What about the Democrats? Are they wimps or something? What is it going to take before they rise up to protest their sellout party leadership? The end of Obamacare as we know it?

How about a third party ticket with George Soros for president and General Wesley Clark for vice-president? (Yes I know George Soros was born in Europe. But after all the money he has shoveled at the Democrats he deserves to be made an honorary natural-born American.)

Never mind about Cuts, you say. What about Jobs? Don’t Democrats care about Jobs?

You can’t really expect rank-and-file Democratic voters to get all bent out of shape about Jobs. After all, Democrats are either billionaires like Warren Buffett, cooing sweet nothings about tax increases in The New York Times, or they are dime-a-dozen liberal trustafarians, or they are government workers, or they are benefit recipients. Why should any of them care about Jobs? Independents care about jobs. So do Republicans.

Have you seen any Democrats out in the streets recently demonstrating about Jobs? I thought not. Rank-and-file Democratic voters don’t spill out into the streets on the issue of Jobs. But they do care about Cuts, just like the Greeks.

If you want to understand the Greek meltdown, writes Takis Michas of the Greek national daily Eleftherotypia, you need to know that Greeks have had a large state and a weak civil society ever since the 1800s.

Since the 1930s, political patronage has been disbursed through increases in public sector employment, regulations that limit competition, and the imposition of levies on transactions that benefit third parties... The view that the state is good and that markets are bad is widespread, held across the political spectrum, and is understandable in a rent-seeking society where all activities, including market transactions, are seen as redistribution.

There’s only one difference between Greece and the United States. It’s in that phrase “across the political spectrum.” In the United States the notion that markets are bad only holds on the liberal side of the spectrum.

In other words our Democratic friends, from Nancy Pelosi down to the activists yelling “Sellout” at her recent town meeting in Oakland, are just like the Greeks. They believe in a big state and they believe in redistribution, known to economists as clientism and rent-seeking. As for the market, they think it is all run by a “corporate oligarchy” in the service of corporate greed. Ask The Nation. Ask the Greeks.

“Socialist governments... always run out of other peoples’ money,” said the grocer’s daughter. That’s why any Republican politician with a hope of winning an election now demands a balanced program of cuts: spending cuts, and tax rate cuts.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


Liberal Coercion

[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State


Moral Imperatives of Modern Culture

These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph


Class War

In England there were always two sharply opposed middle classes, the academic middle class and the commercial middle class. In the nineteenth century, the academic middle class won the battle for power and status... Then came the triumph of Margaret Thatcher... The academics lost their power and prestige and... have been gloomy ever since.
Freeman Dyson, “The Scientist as Rebel”


Government Expenditure

The Union publishes an exact return of the amount of its taxes; I can get copies of the budgets of the four and twenty component states; but who can tell me what the citizens spend in the administration of county and township?
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America


Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill