home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Thursday May 24, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Who Will Mediscare the Dems? A Sluggish Recovery for President Obama

print view

Do the Math, Mr President

by Christopher Chantrill
May 07, 2011 at 12:59 pm

|

PRESIDENT Obama is currently touring the United States selling his FY12 Budget 2.0 that isn’t a budget that emerged from his April 13 speech. His budget isn’t really a budget because he hasn’t actually got any numbers to back up his rhetoric.

So let’s do the numbers for him. President Obama says that he wants the rich to pay “a little more” in federal income taxes. According to the IRS, using the latest numbers, for 2008, the total income tax collection was $1,031 billion. The richest one percent paid $392 billion in federal income tax, and the richest 5 percent paid $606 billion. Wow. The richest one percent are paying almost 38 percent of the income tax and the top 5 percent are already paying about 60 percent of all federal income taxes. Let’s show the situation in class warrior terms.

The richest one percent paying a mere 38 percent of federal income taxes is a violation of the president’s principle of shared sacrifice. These rich should pay a “little more.”

What did you have in mind for “a little more” Mr. President? Five percent? That will raise about $30 billion a year on the richest five percent, and will hardly make a dent in the $1,100 billion deficit. So maybe we’d better raise the ante, and make the rich sacrifice a bit more. Heck, let’s hike their taxes by 25 percent. That will get us $150 billion a year from the richest five percent. That still knocks only ten percent of the deficit.

But wait a minute. According to usgovernmentrevenue.com, the entire haul from the individual income tax in FY2012 is budgeted at $1,140 billion. So there is no way in the world that you can close the deficit, at $1,101 billion in 2012, by asking the rich to “pay a little more.”

Mr. President. I think that maybe you need to work on your math. Because I am sure that you have no intention of taxing the worthy middle class to get that money. Here is a link to usgovernmentrevenue.com’s briefing on the Federal Income Tax to get you started.

And of course, all this math assumes that the rich will just sit there and take it. More likely, they will put their lawyers to work and figure out how to avoid paying. Too bad about the jobs that the rich don’t create for the unemployed when they are spending money on lawyers’ fees.

In the end, as we know, it is Medicare that will end America as we know it. The president’s plan is to save us from a Republican fate worse than death with a death panel of doctors and nurses diligently winkling out price gouging in the health care industry. No doubt they will be just as effective as the administration’s latest wheeze, an oil price-gouging panel at the Justice Department.

But before that, we’ll probably have a debt crisis. Naturally, at usgovernmentspending.com we have a crack team working on this.

Here’s a question for the crack team at usgovernmentspending.com: What would happen to the government’s interest payments if interest rates went up more than the administration estimates? Thank you Mr. President. I’m glad you asked. Here is an analysis of interest payments for the FY12 budget (the first one) from now through 2016. Underneath your estimates of interest rates is an input section that allows users of usgovernmentspending.com to make their own estimates.

Really Mr. President? You reckon that the average interest rate on the federal debt will only go up to 2.7 percent by 2016? Has anyone in your administration looked at the possibility that the sun won’t come out tomorrow? Suppose interest rates cranked up to 3 or 4 percent pretty soon. Then we’d have a trillion dollar deficit each year out through 2016, ending up with an average interest rate on the debt of 4.7 percent in 2016. And historically, 4.7 percent ain’t that high.

Let’s try a less extreme case, and assume that interest rates will start up in mid 2012 in order to stop a run on the dollar. Let’s assume that the average interest on the debt rises about the same as in the late 1970s, when the average interest rate on the debt went from 4.6 percent in 1978, to 5.1 percent in 1979, 5.8 percent in 1980, and then stuck at around 7 percent for most of the Reagan administration. Here’s an analysis assuming that the Fed has to start fighting inflation mid way through next year.

It gets us to trillion dollar deficits each year in the last two years of your second term, Mr. President.

Say, Mr. President, I’ve got an idea. Take a weekend out from your busy town hall schedule and spend a few hours doing the brackets at usgovernmentspending.com. You might learn enough to save our nation from sovereign default. And that would save a lot of ordinary Americans from a lot of unnecessary suffering.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Living Under Law

Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures


German Philosophy

The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since 1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be inadequate. 
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West


Knowledge

Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then, once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Democratic Capitalism

I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all. In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Action

The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness... But to make a man act [he must have] the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action


Churches

[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Living Law

The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill