TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| A Bridge Too Far | After Obama: Forgiveness |
by Christopher Chantrill
June 30, 2010 at 11:42 am
EVERY BAD idea seems to have its Wordsworthian moment:
Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive
But to be young was very heaven.
The early enthusiasm for Keynesian economics certainly qualifies. The dawn of Keynes was very heaven, if you were young back then. But now we are at the moment when a new generation asks: What was all the fuss about?
Last weekends G-20 summit in Toronto issued a veiled rebuke to the Obama administrations continuing appetite for Keynesian stimulus. In a veiled report in the New York Times, Sewell Chan and Jackie Calmes wrote that G-20 leaders called for
a timetable for cutting their deficits and halting the growth of their public debt, despite the Obama administrations concern that reducing spending too quickly might set back the fragile global recovery.
In an un-veiled editorial the Wall Street Journal exulted over the dead end of Keynesian economics. Finally the Journal can report that idea of spending our way to prosperity is going out of style. The blissful dawn is ending in humiliation and failure.
What could ever be so exciting and new about giving governments an excuse to spend and print money? When have governments ever needed an excuse to spend and inflate? If you want excitement, go and get all tingly about limited government, the radical idea of limiting the power of government to spend and inflate.
But, you young uns will ask, how did this crazy Keynesian cult take over the minds of our parents and grandparents?
The answer is that it wasnt easy. Even after decades of progressive and socialist propaganda it took a major government failure in the Great Depression of the 1930s.
In the depths of the Great Depression, capitalism had failed, everyone agreed. It was what we would now call a consensus.
Had capitalism really failed? Hardly. After World War I communism and fascism and social legislation were in the saddle, and government was bulking up all over.
When the Great Crash struck in 1929, progressives and socialists had managed to drive a stake through the heart of capitalism, but the heart was still beating. In the US there was a split between Progressive interventionists like President Hoover and sound money believers in the liquidation of malinvestments. In the middle of it all the clueless Federal Reserve Board split the difference and failed in its primary job to act as a lender of last resort. It rescued the banks that were too big to fail but not the banks that failed to be big.
Then along came Keynes and his book, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, and made inflationism and deficit spending no longer the last resort of a failed royal dynasty, but the first resort of a sophisticated cosmopolitan. No wonder everyone thought it was bliss to be alive.
The pièce de resistance of Keynes theory was the Multiplier. The more money the government spent the more it multiplied and would stimulate the economy. When economists actually got around to doing research on the Keynesian Multiplier, they found it didnt work. See Barro and Redlick, Stimulus Spending Doesnt Work.
Keynesian economics was a failure right of the the gate in the 1930s. Thats why the Great Depression lingered on as FDR and his Brains Trust tried one bold persistent experimentation after another.
It took six years of bold persistent failure, but the American people finally decided, in the off-year elections of 1938, they had had enough and sent 79 new Republicans to Congress. You can read all about it in Amity Shlaes The Forgotten Man and also at usstuckonstupid.com.
Thirty years later in the 1960s, liberals tried again and ended up sending a grade B Hollywood actor to the White House in 1980 in an inflationary recession.
Now its thirty years later, again, and the Keynesians are making one last college try. Its not working any better than it did in the Great Depression and the 1970s. But theres a difference. Back in the early 1930s the US government debt was a mere 25 percent of GDP. Now, in 2010, it is budgeted at about 95 percent of GDP. Its one thing to throw borrowed money at uneconomic projects when the national debt is down at 25 percent. When the debt is at 95 percent of GDP the money power starts to murmur about the risk of sovereign default.
As we enter the end game of Keynesianism, the words of Pope John Paul II in the end game of a bad idea should inspire us once again. Be not afraid. Just as the Poles werent going to get rid of Communism without a struggle, we were never going to get rid of Keynesian economics on the cheap.
We wont bury Keynesian economics until after Keynesian economics buries the liberals. Fortunately, as Marx might have said, history during the Obama administration is repeating itself as farce.
Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures
The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since
1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and
philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be
inadequate.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West
Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its
characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then,
once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all.
In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness...
But to make a man act [he must have]
the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove
or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action
[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital
mysql close
©2007 Christopher Chantrill