TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| Who Is The Smartest of Them All? | Take Me To Your Leader |
by Christopher Chantrill
March 12, 2009 at 12:09 pm
MANY CONSERVATIVES experience President Obamas budget as a radical lurch to the left. Obviously, they conclude, President Obama is a radical lefty.
Unfortunately its worse than that. President Obama is not leading from the left of his party. He is leading from the center.
Scratch a liberal and you will find someone who believes in universal health care run by the government. But President Obamas budget doesnt do that, not yet. It just sets a clear course towards that long-term liberal goal.
Scratch a liberal and you will find someone who believes in universal education from early-childhood education to graduate school. She will nod approvingly when her European guest relates how she got a government stipend while doing post-doc work at a university in the United States. President Obamas budget doesnt do all that. Not yet.
And we all know that liberals are getting ready to believe that global-warming skeptics are ethically close to being Holocaust deniers.
If you are a moderateand that usually means you are not that engaged in politicswhy would you argue with a president who wants to improve access to health care, expand educational opportunities, and do something about climate change? Dont we all want health care, education, and a habitable planet?
Of course we do. But isnt there a better way than turning the United States into a nation of freeloaders ever searching for a free government program to meet its needs?
Liberals have made freeloading into a way of lifeeven for the well to do. Theres the well-to-do woman who cadges free meds from a physician relative. Theres the well-to-do woman whos signed up for her states basic health plan. Theres 2007s S-CHIP poster child whose parents can afford late-model cars and private school tuition but not health insurance.
The great problem of human society is the problem of the freeloader. How do you get people to pull their weight instead of take advantage? Religion, it turns out, is mankinds best answer to the problem. If you dont have religion then you have to pursue freeloaders with force, as the liberal welfare state is finding out.
You can see the conservative problem in this battle of ideas. Conservatives say that people should pay for their own health care; thats the only way to get costs down. Its the only way to find out what people really value when it comes to protecting their health. But liberals say that health care is a right. Conservatives approve of parents that remove their children from the public schools to teach them at home; they think thats the difference between a 13 year-old philosopher like Jonathan Krohn and a whiny adolescent in thrall to his whiny adolescent peers. Liberals say that homeschooled children arent properly socialized.
Moderates go along to get along. Why should they push against the stream? Its just too hard.
There never was an age of conformity quite like this one, wrote William F. Buckley, Jr., half a century ago, and sometimes it seems like conservatives are the only ones around that wont conform to the liberal line. Conservatives advance the idea that there ought to be a wall of separation between government and society. They talk about little platoons and empowering people in voluntary mediating institutions between government and the individual. They talk about the movement from status to contract.
Back in the nineteenth century this was all new and unprecedented. But it got such a head of steam that liberals took fright and spent the next century putting the lid back on. Health care shouldnt be arranged in friendly societies and mutual-aid associations, they said; much better let liberals run it from the government. Education shouldnt be done by amateurs; much better let liberals run it from the government. And theyve never liked Americans driving around using energy without permission.
Our liberal friends tell the world that conservatism is a reactionary movement. It is not. It is a movement of gentle reform that is trying create a new world of ordered freedom that escapes from the rigid status society once run by a warrior aristocracy and and now dominated by a liberal oligarchy.
Today the liberal oligarchy is in the ascendant. Perhaps it will succeed in ratcheting up the level of compulsion in health care and in education.
But let us hope for better things. Let us hope that the American people will revolt against the further expansion of the liberal freeloader culture.
But our fellow Americans wont have a chance without a broad conservative movement willing to risk life, fortune, and sacred honor in the cause to persuade them with the truth.
Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.
[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists, she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008
Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists
conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
[T]he way to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,
Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop
discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
Paul Dirac: When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated
by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that
I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion.
However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and
inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he
suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.
John Farrell, The Creation Myth
Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization
No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, Letter to Lord Lytton
In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society
mysql close
©2007 Christopher Chantrill