Women And Safety

NOW THAT President Obama is safely inaugurated into the office of President of the United States, working on pleasurable stimuli for the Democratic faithful, let us resume our conservative seminar. While the Democratic stoats and weasels roister and revel at Toad Hall, we stalwarts of the republic, Moles and Rattys and Badgers, even the excitable Mr. Toad himself, must think and plan for the day when Toad Hall will be returned to its rightful owner.

The biggest problem we have to consider is the Woman Problem. We have to confront the fact that one of the reasons that we live in an age of Big Government is that ever since they first got the vote, women have used their franchise to vote for more government. Can we even hope for change?

Consider a moderately liberal woman of my acquaintance pondering the awful fact that her son, studying for a Ph.D. in Classics, considers himself a conservative. Fortunately a mother, even a liberal mother, cannot bring herself to disown her son for apostasy. So she has allowed our worthy brother-in-arms to persuade her that there is something of life beyond “basic needs.” Whereas his mother thinks of politics as legislating to make people safe through schools, health care, lunches, etc., her son asks her to consider also the call of the good, the true, the beautiful, and the care of the soul. Then he asks her to wonder what it means to pass a law that weakens the ability of people to develop these perennial virtues.

Woman thinks first of safety, and thinks nothing of erecting a vast apparatus of compulsion to achieve it. But woman is not just wedded to safety. She is also defined by her relationships. She does not just want those in her circle of care to be safe; she wants them to thrive and be happy.

Woman wants safe, but does government really deliver on safe beyond national defense and domestic policing? Is it safe for government to run risky “affordable housing” schemes? The result is a Federal Reserve Board swinging madly from credit flood to credit crunch and foreclosing women out of their dream homes. Is it safe for government to compel children into its government schools? The result is said to be STD infection in about 25 percent of high-schoolers. Is it safe for government to subsidize single parenthood in the name of compassion? The result is fatherless children growing up into violent adults and criminals that disproportionately target women.

Our task is clear. We must persuade women in the truth, that they will not find safety in a pile of government programs for health care, for education, and for welfare. Government does not care for women; it just wants their votes. Government cares about only one thing: Power.

We must work for the day when women wake up and realize that big government oppresses women more than the patriarchy ever did. If they come to realize that, it will be because conservatives have persuaded them, using good conservative conversation, that government doesn’t care about people. Government is force, not safety.

While everyone is wondering what kind of stimulus package President Obama will offer to the nation, let us start work on the big issues on women and safety. President Obama proposes to increase government control of health care. This means that health care will become less responsive to the special needs of consumers (read: women). President Obama proposes to increase government control of education with the first step towards universal pre-kindergarten. This means that education will become less responsive to the needs of the parents of special children (read: women). President Obama proposes to increase the investment into alternative energy and discourage use of fossil fuels. That will make transportation for expensive for consumers (read: women).

A majority of male voters are already sold on the conservative vision. That’s not too surprising, given the costs that government piles on every man of aspiration from Joe the Plumber on up. Now the job of conservatives is to persuade women. Can we persuade women that safety is not spelled government? There’s one encouraging indicator. Women are more easily persuaded to change their minds on political issues than men.

But there is still the awful possibility that women actually like the current system, in which government gets to demolish freedom every day with some new legislation to improve “safety.” After all, if TV commercials are to be believed, women eagerly respond to the idea that men are useless incompetents that need constant direction and supervision.

It couldn’t be that women actually prefer the present welfare state. It couldn’t be that they want suffocating government control and regulation over the conservative alternative. It couldn’t be that they prefer compulsion over a voluntary community that mediates between the individual and the megastructure of government. Could it?

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

TAGS

Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.” —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust

Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems� No more rules, no more models� Genius conjures up rather than learns� ” —Victor Hugo
C�sar Gra�a, Bohemian versus Bourgeois

Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990

Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing

Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit

Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

mysql close