home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Thursday May 24, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Never Misunderestimate Made for Each Other

print view

Suborning the Scientists

by Christopher Chantrill
November 30, 2003 at 7:00 pm

|

I WAS LOOKING through my mother’s bookshelf over Thanksgiving sampling the many volumes she has about climate change.  Back in 1980, for instance, she got Our Turbulent Sun, by Kendrick Frazier, which discusses the importance of determining whether the “solar constant” or energy output of the sun is in fact constant or variable.  The answer is: variable, at least in the short term.

More recently, she has acquired some books by Brian Fagan with titles like Floods, Famines and Emperors, a popular work about the devastation wreaked by El Niño, and The Little Ice Age, about the climatic cooling that occurred in the middle of the last millennium.

There is a significant difference in outlook between books published in the 1980s and 1990s.  No modern book is complete without a stern warning about the dangers of global warming.  That is odd, you might think, in a book about El Niño in which the proudest principalities and powers are shown as helpless before the might of natural forces.

The paradox disappears when you remember that global warming has been a godsend to the scientists. When a politician like Al Gore writes a book called Earth in the Balance that advertises that we are all done for unless by submit to strong and principled political leadership on the environmental front, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out that there is gold in them there hills.  So now every popular science book has a final chapter that ties it all into global warming, and our wasteful ways with the sacred earth.

But I just don’t get it. The modest research that I have conducted into the climate sciences leads me to believe that the big problem we have right now is Ice Ages.  Although, as Daniel Botkin writes in Discordant Harmonies, the climate of the earth is variable in all time scales, there is no disputing the fact that the climate of the past few million years has been glacial with the occasional “interglacial period” that tends to last about 10,000 years.  Right now, it’s about 10,000 years since the end of the last ice age.

You would think that politicians and scientists would be cudgeling their brains to figure out the mechanism that plunges the earth into an ice age (and, by all accounts, it seems to happen quite suddenly).  But you would be wrong.  Instead, they are focused like a laser on elucidating the mechanism of global warming, with a militant faith that it is all due to human greed in the century since the dawn of the Industrial Age.  Now that God has died for our elites and sin with Him, the best and the brightest seem determined to smuggle sin in the back door with the help of the climate sciences.

Now that conservatives have control the Congress and the Presidency, it is time to do something about this.

For years, the liberals showered the scientists with money, and the scientists showered the liberals with studies showing exactly what the liberals wanted.  More government.  More power for the welfare state.  Of course, the scientists always qualified their results; at the end of all their books they were careful to note that more research was needed.  But meanwhile, enough was known for the Supreme Court to ban segregated schools, or mandate busing.  Or validate abortion on demand.  Or ending the death penalty.  It’s time to put a stop to it.

But won’t the scientists object?  Well yes, they probably will, but in the end they will go with the money.  Andrew Carnegie proved this a century ago with his plan to award free pensions to college professors.  There was one minor condition, that the colleges should sever their ties with any sectarian institution.  Most colleges hardly blinked as they amended their constitutions to abjure and deny their religious affiliation.  You probably know the residual legatee of Carnegie’s largess.  It’s called TIAA/CREF.

Then there were the physicists.  They had a grand old time fainting away like Victorian debutantes in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists while the government drenched them in filthy lucre to develop the science behind nuclear weapons.

It’s time for Republicans to flex their muscles.  We need an Ice Age Initiative, and we’ll turn around the scientists from their global warming enthusiasm in the time it takes to write a grant proposal.  After all, there is so much more research that needs to be done.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust


Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems… No more rules, no more models… Genius conjures up rather than learns… ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006


China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill