home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Thursday May 24, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

The Liberals' Mommy Fascism A Budget Valentine

print view

The Path to Real Change

by Christopher Chantrill
February 08, 2008 at 1:38 am

|

AFTER SUPER Tuesday the picture has changed.  The Democratic race is all tied up and Mitt Romney has made a graceful exit.

But what about the issues? The war! The judges! The Bush tax cuts!

The fact is that the American people aren’t listening. They just want change. They are worried about all the excitement that Republicans have brought them over the last seven years.

First there was 9/11. There was the bursting of the tech bubble and the bursting of the real-estate bubble. There was the doubling of gasoline prices. Then there is the Iraq war and its constant reminder that the world is a dangerous world.

All of this, remember, happened on President Bush’s watch.

So Americans want to “change” the watch. They just want some “change” from all this change. Republicans are turning to the Republican who did most to oppose President Bush. And they are turning to a Clinton for a reprise of the happy-go-lucky 1990s.

But despite the general agreement that the American people want change, nobody is offering it. Republicans do not have a candidate offering transformative change. Nor do the Democrats.

The Democrats are offering two solid liberals for President of the United States. The Republicans are offering candidates who, if even they present themselves as conservatives, are not exactly committed conservatives like the sainted Ronald Reagan. John McCain is conservative as far as his obstinate nature instinctively guides him and his lust for for the adulation of the beltway media permits him. The defeated Mitt Romney is a businessman and a manager. He’s a decent sort but he is not a transformative leader.

Senator McCain certainly cares about the war, and maybe about the judges. So maybe Republicans have the candidate that can stop the Democrats from losing the war on terror, like Jimmy Carter almost lost the Cold War. And he can prevent the appointment of four or five liberal justices to the United States Supreme Court.

This inordinate fear of Democratic government misses the point.

We cannot win the war on terror with partisan trench warfare. And we cannot win the culture war by stuffing the Supreme Court with conservative justices and hoping that over time we get to fill more vacancies than the liberals.

We need to create an America in which Democrats believe in the war on terror and believe that our western culture deserves to be not just defended but celebrated. We need to create an America where liberal justices on the Supreme Court have soured on the notion of the “living constitution” and only with great reluctance overturn the wisdom of the founders.

In other words, we need to win the larger war for hearts and minds. It is useless to drag the great questions of our times into vicious partisan mudbaths. All that does is cover the great questions with mud and make our liberal friends more determined than ever to defend their programs to the last minority woman.

We need to change liberal hearts and minds. We need to change their minds about life. We need to change their minds about the family. We need to change their minds about the economy. We need them to begin to question their faith in the benefits of compulsory government programs.

How, for instance, are we going to change the minds of the liberals about the war on terror?

The answer is bracing. We must give them a chance screw it up, like Jimmy Carter screwed up the Cold War with his 1977 claim that the US had got over its “inordinate fear of communism.” After President Carter had really screwed up the Cold War and really screwed up the economy, then the American people were ready for Ronald Reagan.

That is the conservative way. You treat Democrats like adults. You let them make mistakes and you hope they learn from them. When they don’t learn then you get to win landslide elections.

The liberal way is to treat people like children. You legislate law libraries full of laws to micromanage behavior. You force people to live healthy lives and keep them safe, and you give liberals lots of jobs administering the laws. But under the liberal way people never learn, because they never get to make mistakes.

The American people are right. It is time for a change. Then we’ll show ’em.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Socialism equals Animism

Imagining that all order is the result of design, socialists conclude that order must be improvable by better design of some superior mind.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Sacrifice

[Every] sacrifice is an act of impurity that pays for a prior act of greater impurity... without its participants having to suffer the full consequences incurred by its predecessor. The punishment is commuted in a process that strangely combines and finesses the deep contradiction between justice and mercy.
Frederick Turner, Beauty: The Value of Values


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Racial Discrimination

[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Roberts, C.J., Parents Involved in Community Schools vs. Seattle School District


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Physics, Religion, and Psychology

Paul Dirac: “When I was talking with Lemaître about [the expanding universe] and feeling stimulated by the grandeur of the picture that he has given us, I told him that I thought cosmology was the branch of science that lies closest to religion. However [Georges] Lemaître [Catholic priest, physicist, and inventor of the Big Bang Theory] did not agree with me. After thinking it over he suggested psychology as lying closest to religion.”
John Farrell, “The Creation Myth”


Pentecostalism

Within Pentecostalism the injurious hierarchies of the wider world are abrogated and replaced by a single hierarchy of faith, grace, and the empowerments of the spirit... where groups gather on rafts to take them through the turbulence of the great journey from extensive rural networks to the mega-city and the nuclear family...
David Martin, On Secularization


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill