home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Thursday May 24, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Conservative Passing Gear New Hope for Education Sufferers

print view

Climate Science Gets Serious

by Christopher Chantrill
April 24, 2004 at 8:00 pm

|

FOR YEARS, I’ve scoffed at the Al Gores of the world and their bribed apologists in the science community.  Time after time, they have presented single point departures from an assumed eternal climate equilibrium and forecast imminent disaster unless we did something.  And that something usually involved giving them emergency powers to change the world.

I’ve always said that the big climate issue for mankind is ice ages.  What’s the point of reducing greenhouse gases in a heroic renunciation of SUVs if it just brings on the next ice age?

But now comes Bill Ruddiman from the University of Virginia in Climatic Change with the news that climate change didn’t start in 1800 with James Watt and the steam engine.  It started about 8,000 BP with the invention of agriculture.  And it looks like we have already managed to stave off the next ice age with our evil deforestation of the planet.

Ruddiman’s theory is pretty simple.  About 8,000 years ago, mankind started clearing forests for agriculture.  This released lots of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.  About 5,000 years ago we started flood rice cultivation.  That increased the release of methane into the atmosphere.  This combination of greenhouse gases arrested a global cooling trend that had started about 10,000 years ago.

Ruddiman accepts as established fact that the ice age cycle is driven by cyclical fluctuations in energy received from the sun that seem to exhibit a cycle of about 20,000 years.  The last peak in “insolation” occurred just about 10,000 years ago, when the sun delivered in midsummer about 505 watts of energy per square meter .  Right now, according to the natural fluctuation in the solar energy, we should be receiving insolation at about 475 watts per square meter and plunging into an ice age.  Only we aren’t in an ice age.  Ruddiman says you can thank the family farmer for that.

Of course, since the industrial revolution, we moderns have added about 150 billion tons of carbon to the atmosphere to the 300 billion tons previously put there by the world’s farmers during the age of agriculture.  Our human activities are placing a bigger and bigger bet on the world’s future.  But the date of the Fall into environmental sin must now be pushed back from 200 years in the past to 8,000 years in the past.  It puts a different aspect on things. 

It is one thing to say that we have suddenly polluted an innocent world with our industrial filth; it is another thing to say that our current industrial age intensifies trends initiated 8,000 years ago by the first farmers.  Especially if it seems likely that man-made climate change has staved off a plunge into a new ice age.

The presumption at the core of the environmental movement is that the planet enjoyed a “natural” environment until the dawn of the industrial age, and that if we act now we can restore its natural state before it is too late.  But Ruddiman shows that we have been influencing the climate much longer than that.  It is already too late to return to an environmental Eden.

But if it is no longer possible to return to Eden, then life becomes more complex.  We must like Adam and Eve look forward not back.  If we humans are going to influencing the global climate, for good or ill, what do we want to do with it?  Would we like to move the temperate zones north or south?  Would we like the ocean level higher or lower?   What would be the ideal monsoon for South Asia and its 1.5 billion people?  And who is “we?”  So far, the climate debate has been shockingly Eurocentric.  What will global warming do to the Chinese?  What will it do for South Asia?  For Africa?

The answer is probably close to the advice tendered by ecologist Daniel Botkin in Discordant Harmonies.  Nature fluctuates in all time scales, but it cannot respond to change too fast.  For instance, the North American forests have migrated north and south across the continent many times in response to climate change.  They will do so again, but they would prefer that the change weren’t too sudden.  Likewise, humans have migrated across the world for millennia in search of better living conditions, and will continue to do so.  Intelligent and adaptable, we will continue to respond and to migrate.  But we would prefer if the change weren’t too sudden.  We must decide what we want to grow in our garden and face the consequences of our decisions.

We can no longer return to the Garden of Eden.  We never could.  We must go on, and not look back.  But that is nothing new for humans, for the biosphere, or indeed, for the entire universe.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Living Under Law

Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures


German Philosophy

The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since 1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be inadequate. 
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West


Knowledge

Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then, once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Democratic Capitalism

I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all. In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Action

The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness... But to make a man act [he must have] the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action


Churches

[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Living Law

The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital


mysql close

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill