TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| It's Official: Left-Islamist Alliance Against the West | The Lesson of New Orleans |
by Christopher Chantrill
August 28, 2005 at 9:17 am
HERE WE are at back-to-school time, and all across the nation colleges are prodding our children into freshman orientation. Today, of course, that means catechizing the young into the religion of “anti-racism.” And instead of inducting our kids into the cult of Americanism, they humiliate them into the “cult of multiculturalism,” according to college senior Kevin Carter.
Humiliation? Isn’t that what they do at army boot camp and white-boy fraternity rushes? But humiliation is now at the center of modern freshman orientation. Kevin Carter’s began with a video on the Matthew Shephard killing and then a “lecture from a supposed expert on ‘hate.’” After a ritual humiliation of the white guys in the audience, it was back to the dorm “to break up into focus groups so that we could have a ‘dialogue’ on how to fight “‘hate.’” The freshman orientation turned out to be a bonding experience, but not in the way that the powers-that-be had intended. After it was over the white guys got together and angrily exchanged “offensive” jokes using “insensitive” language all night.
So the liberals are doing a good job at turning off white guys. Maybe that explains why boys don’t do well in high school, and are heading down towards 40 percent of the college student body.
But when our young boys are not moldering away in the bums-on-seats prison of liberal-run schooling they are putting enormous energy into their first-person shooter video games and into racing up the multiple learning curves of today’s networked world. Of course they are also wasting enormous amounts of time in internet chat rooms in the eternal search for “hot” babes. (Reckless prediction: they are building a subculture that will rival the baby boomers’ Sixties culture).
Why exactly do we condemn our children to all those years of bums-on-seats government education? Can’t we think of something better for our children to do? We used to. Back in the nineteenth century most children went to school for four or five years. Then they went to work. They had to, because their families needed the money. Anthony Drexel went to work as a clerk in his father’s ramshackle bank at age twelve. As an adult he taught rich-kid J. P. Morgan the banking business as senior partner in the firm of Drexel and Morgan.
Today, we don’t need the money. And because we can’t think of anything better for our children to do, we let them goof off in government warehouses for most of their childhood.
What exactly is education for? Back in the nineteenth century the elite wanted a top-down universal education to teach morals to the lower orders and lower the crime rate. Meanwhile the people built a bottom-up education in the three Rs to get their children out of the mill and the mine. Today the elite wants to grab our children and teach them to hate the Four Horsemen of the Modern Apocalypse: Racism, Sexism, Classism, and Homophobia. We, the people of the twenty-first century, dislike the elite’s program, but not enough to put a stop to it.
Why are we pumping more and more money into a K-12 education system that delivers less and less? Why are we ratcheting up the subsidies for universities every year when most kids major in drink and sex—or “extracurriculars” according to recent Harvard grad Ross Douthat in The Atlantic? We do it because we don’t have a better idea.
It’s time for conservatives to fill up the educational vacuum. But let us rise above a shameful program of “reducing crime” or “anti-racism” that is really a mask for imposing our values on the rest of the nation. We are better than that. Let our program just be this. We don’t know how other parents ought to educate their children; that’s their business. But we demand, as an ancient and immemorial liberty, the right to educate our own children according to our lights.
What should our lights, our educational philosophy, be? We could start with the sensible ideas of mystery novelist (and Oxford educated) Dorothy L. Sayers in Education in a Free Society, ed. Anne Husted Burleigh. Brilliantly anglicizing advanced continental developmental child psychology into three Ages, “the Poll-Parrot, the Pert, and the Poetic,” she proposes a return to the medieval Trivium. The first stage, Grammar, matches the child’s Poll-Parrot Age when memorization is easy and pleasurable. The second stage is Dialectics and matches the child’s Pert Age, “characterized by contradicting, answering back, liking to ‘catch people out.’” The final stage is Rhetoric and matches the Poetic Age, striving for independence, creativity, and finding a métier.
It would certainly be an improvement over today’s program of “anti-racism” and multiculturalism that seems to be arrested, like the left-wing blogosphere, in the adolescent Pert Age.
Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures
The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since
1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and
philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be
inadequate.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West
Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its
characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then,
once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all.
In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness...
But to make a man act [he must have]
the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove
or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action
[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital
mysql close
©2007 Christopher Chantrill