TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| Chapter 7: The Best Schools | Beyond the Judicial Filibuster |
by Christopher Chantrill
March 19, 2005 at 3:20 am
SUPPOSE you were a liberal still deeply afflicted by PEST (post-election selection trauma), reeling from the Iraq election and now deeply disturbed by the Cedar Revolution in Beirut. What would finally put you on the train for Canada?
Imagine a story about a middle-class African American man accused of rape. The 210-pound athlete breaks away from his 5’-0” jailer, a 51 year-old grandmother, kills a bunch of people including a judge, and after an extended manhunt is persuaded to give himself up by a blonde young Bible-quoting widowed mother. It’s a perfect storm.
So, you say, what’s the big deal? Don’t forget that today you are not allowed to show African Americans in a negative light. You are not allowed even to think that there are some jobs that a woman can’t do as well as a man. You should avoid depicting murder and mayhem directed at the nation’s judges, who are in the middle of discovering there is “no rational purpose” to banning gay marriage. And of course, you can’t show a mere amateur talking a dangerous fugitive into giving himself up. Everyone knows that it takes trained psychologists, hostage negotiators, and intervention experts assisted by the full panoply of SWAT teams and their cool gear if you want to talk a dangerous murderer into surrender.
But then Brian Nichols and Ashley Smith broke through the wall of liberal denial like a tsunami. Accused rapist Brian Nichols was a good middle-class kid. On the other hand, maybe not. Back in his college days he was accused of assault after an incident in the dining hall. He played football at two colleges, but was kicked off a team for stealing from the locker room. He’d been in a long-term relationship with the woman he was accused of raping, but she rather went off him after he got another woman pregnant.
So he overpowered his grandmotherly guard, shot a few people, and ended up kidnapping 24 year-old widowed mother Ashley Smith at a convenience store at 2 am on Saturday morning.
News reports about Ashley Smith describe a rather purposeful young woman who, immediately after being kidnapped, started to do something about it. Pretty soon, she was reading the Bible to her captor, and then offered to read from the book she had in her bedroom. It was The Purpose-driven Life “The #1 New York Times Bestseller” by megachurch pastor Rick Warren.
They read Chapter 33 together. For those of you without your own copy to refer to, Chapter 33 is titled “How Real Servants Act.” The epigraph reads: “Whoever wants to be great must become a servant.” Warren writes about how we talk a lot these days about leadership and very little about “servantship,” and that the real purpose to life is to become a good servant. The Point to Ponder at the end of the chapter is “I serve God by serving others.”
Having softened Nichols up with the Word of God and what we may, with pardonable hyperbole, call the modern version of Erasmus’s #1 bestseller Enchiridion, Smith talked to Nichols about her little daughter. If he were to kill her then her daughter, already without a father, would be an orphan, without father or mother. Nichols released her and she immediately called 911.
You can see why the Nichols-Smith saga would never pass the liberal censor. It is full of all the wrong messages. It sets up an over-indulged young Icarus who’s spent his life getting his wings burned against a young woman who is deadly serious about giving her life a purpose. It shows the liberal culture of individual self-indulgence and positive self-esteem up against conservative rules and purpose.
Our liberal friends are proud to claim their commitment to Reason. While they represent the progressive advance of Reason, conservatives are standpatters wedded to superstition. A California Superior Court judge just ruled in favor of gay marriage on the grounds that there was “no rational purpose” to oppose it.
Well, he has a point. But he could argue anything that way. He could also argue that there is “no rational purpose” to preventing a 51-year-old grandmother from guarding an accused rapist who has already been detected with makeshift weapons. There is “no rational purpose” to the idea that women cannot do any job a man can do. The only objection is common sense.
Liberals that hang their hats on Reason don’t know what they are talking about. They are turning back the clock to an exploded Enlightenment myth that thoughtful people regard as a comical superstition. In the twentieth century, the warrant for knowledge is that Reason, or theory, must check out against the facts. And better still, knowledge should, as Karl Popper proposed, be “falsifiable,” unlike the orthodoxy of the established Church of Positive Self-Esteem and the doctrine that sexual differences are nothing but social construction.
Against the orthodoxy of Reason, conservatives champion the warrant of common sense. And a good thing too.
Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures
The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since
1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and
philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be
inadequate.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West
Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its
characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then,
once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all.
In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness...
But to make a man act [he must have]
the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove
or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action
[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital
mysql close
©2007 Christopher Chantrill