home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Tuesday February 7, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

ROAD TO THE

MIDDLE CLASS

Contents

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

Chapter 3

Chapter 4

Chapter 5

Chapter 6

Chapter 7

Chapter 8

Chapter 9

Chapter 10

Chapter 11

Chapter 12

Chapter 13

Chapter 14

Chapter 15

Bibliography

Chapter 1:
After the Welfare State

| <<prev | 1 | 2 | (3) |print view

But what moves a liberal like Fogel think that matters are so urgent that the First Amendment needs to be suspended, and that the federal government—meaning presumably Fogel and a corps of like-minded policy analysts—should be empowered to institute a top-down program of national spiritual enrichment?  The answer lies in the first half of his title: The Fourth Great Awakening.  Fogel believes that the United States is presently in the middle of a great spiritual awakening, similar to the Great Awakening of 1748-50 that set New England ablaze with religious fervor and that, in the opinion of many observers, lit the fuse that exploded into the American Revolution. 

The modern Great Awakening has two major currents, according to Fogel.  There is a movement of “old lights,” enthusiastic Protestants like Billy Graham, the TV evangelists, the thousands of independent evangelical and Pentecostal churches, the pro-life movement, the “religious right,” and Christian media phenomena like the Left Behind series.  And there is a movement of “new lights:” the human potential movement, New Age Christians, positive self-esteemers, yoga practitioners, and followers of Zen.

Fogel’s concept of the Fourth Great Awakening is derived from Revivals, Awakenings, and Reform, in which religious historian William G. McLoughlin proposed that religion is the engine that powers US politics.  He identified five religious outbursts that set the agenda for a generation of politics.  The Puritan outburst of 1600 propelled the first colonists to New England; the First Great Awakening of 1748-50 led to the American Revolution a generation later.  The Second Great Awakening led to the birth of the Republican party and the Civil War.  The Third Great Awakening and the Social Gospelers launched the progressive politics that has dominated the twentieth century.

If, as McLoughlin and Fogel propose, the United States is indeed in the middle of a Fourth Great Awakening that started between 1950 and 1960, then it is a matter of great moment to those occupying the commanding heights of politics and culture.  If the wrong side wins, the present incumbents could be thrown out of power and reduced to a rump mouldering away in distant university sinecures, all their dreams of money, power, and the love of beautiful women gone up in smoke.  In such an emergency, the suspension of the establishment clause of the First Amendment is merely a necessary expedient.  The progressives must co-opt and control the Fourth Great Awakening to preserve their power to do good, and prevent the United States from falling into the hands of “old lights” and reactionaries who would turn back the clock to 1930 or earlier.

To the observer of establishment culture, it is startling to encounter an establishment author who suggests that religion is a critical factor that drives politics.  It is more usual to encounter the columnist who confidently affirms that America faces a “continuing struggle to move from a Puritan, pioneer, outlaw heritage of fighting for basic survival needs… to a civilization that is nonviolent, fair, and respectful of others,” or to sit at dinner next to a man who bitterly rails for hours against Puritanism, repression, and hate.  In the educated circles of the United States, it is received wisdom that organized religion is, if not a superstition, at least obsolete.  The Protestant ethic was all very well back in the nineteenth century, but the complexities and diversities of the modern era require something more flexible than the dualism of Heaven and Hell.  There must be a better way of socializing people than scaring them to death with shame and guilt.  And yet enthusiastic Protestantism is growing rapidly in the United States and elsewhere in the world.

In the 1950s, all church denominations in the US experienced a growth in membership.  However, from the 1960s onwards, only the enthusiastic denominations increased rapidly.  By 1980, the new enthusiastic Christians had appeared on the radar of national politics; by 1990 evangelical Christians had become part of the base of the Republican party.  By 2001, Tony Carnes reported in The Wall Street Journal that a new Pentecostal church was opening in New York City every three weeks, so that “a local research institute has officially identified 3,800 Pentecostal churches in New York, but believes that even that number is an undercount.”

Things were getting so bad that The New Republic sent Hanna Rosin down to South Carolina before the presidential primary in March 2000 to report on the religious right.  What she discovered sheds useful light upon the notion of a Fourth Great Awakening and upon the people caught up in it.  And it elevates the question why, after a triumphant century of the welfare state, people on the road to the middle class should still be thronging into the enthusiastic Christian churches.

 

 

 


| <<prev | 1 | 2 | (3) |print view

 

Click for Chapter 2: Down in South Carolina and Out in Brooklyn

 

Your comments are welcome. Please e-mail to Christopher Chantrill at mailto:chrischantrill@gmail.com, and take the RMC test here.

©2005 Christopher Chantrill

 TAGS


Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust


What Liberals Think About Conservatives

[W]hen I asked a liberal longtime editor I know with a mainstream [publishing] house for a candid, shorthand version of the assumptions she and her colleagues make about conservatives, she didn't hesitate. “Racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-choice fascists,” she offered, smiling but meaning it.
Harry Stein, I Can't Believe I'm Sitting Next to a Republican


Liberal Coercion

[T]he Liberal, and still more the subspecies Radical... more than any other in these latter days seems under the impression that so long as he has a good end in view he is warranted in exercising over men all the coercion he is able[.]
Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State


Moral Imperatives of Modern Culture

These emerge out of long-standing moral notions of freedom, benevolence, and the affirmation of ordinary life... I have been sketching a schematic map... [of] the moral sources [of these notions]... the original theistic grounding for these standards... a naturalism of disengaged reason, which in our day takes scientistic forms, and a third family of views which finds its sources in Romantic expressivism, or in one of the modernist successor visions.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008


Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006


Never Trust Experts

No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome: if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent: if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe. They all require their strong wine diluted by a very large admixture of insipid common sense.
Lord Salisbury, “Letter to Lord Lytton”


Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph


Class War

In England there were always two sharply opposed middle classes, the academic middle class and the commercial middle class. In the nineteenth century, the academic middle class won the battle for power and status... Then came the triumph of Margaret Thatcher... The academics lost their power and prestige and... have been gloomy ever since.
Freeman Dyson, “The Scientist as Rebel”


 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill