Feds Want More Control Over Colleges

ARE YOU SURPRISED? The federal government is worried about higher education. A year ago Education Secretary Margaret Spellings set up a commission, according to Sam Dillon in The New York Times,

to examine access, affordability and accountability, to determine whether colleges were turning out students qualified to compete in the global economy.

You can see her point. The federal government pours billions of dollars into the nation’s colleges and what do they get for it?

Well, now Spellings’ commission has voted on a report in which

[i]t calls for public universities to measure learning with standardized tests, federal monitoring of college quality and sweeping changes in financial aid.

This sounds like No College Student Left Behind. Why not, after the stunning success of No Child Left Behind?

But the truth is that government intervention in education has been a disaster.

It used to be that parents stumped up big money for their children’s education. The poor even starved themselves so that their children would not have to work at the mill or go down the mine. Now parents sit around and complain as their children fail to learn at the compulsory government school.

It used to be that youngsters went to work in their teens, and struggled to get an education at night school. Now they sit around and party.

The fact is that we really don’t know what we want our education system to do. Every generation some group of enthusiasts comes along and demands that the government spends money on their pet educational project. Then they go away and another tranche of cash gets thrown down the education rathole.

But jealous legislators and bureaucratic control freaks also have an agenda. They want control. When they are spending billions on professors and administrators they want accountability. Or at least they want to call the shots.

So every five years or so they come up with another plan to assert bureaucratic control over the sprawling educational establishment.

But what is really needed is to find out what kind of education people would seek out if they were spending their own money. Then you wouldn’t have to worry about whether students “were qualified to compete in the global economy.” You could say, instead: Hey, they got a job don’t they?

If parents and students spent their own money on education then you wouldn’t need expensive commissions and draconian controls.

When people spend their own money, they get the education they pay for, and the government has no business interfering.

Sphere: Related Content |

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

TAGS

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990

Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society

Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Living Under Law

Law being too tenuous to rely upon in [Ulster and the Scottish borderlands], people developed patterns of settling differences by personal fighting and family feuds.
Thomas Sowell, Conquests and Cultures

German Philosophy

The primary thing to keep in mind about German and Russian thought since 1800 is that it takes for granted that the Cartesian, Lockean or Humean scientific and philosophical conception of man and nature... has been shown by indisputable evidence to be inadequate.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Meeting of East and West

Knowledge

Inquiry does not start unless there is a problem... It is the problem and its characteristics revealed by analysis which guides one first to the relevant facts and then, once the relevant facts are known, to the relevant hypotheses.
F.S.C. Northrop, The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities

Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.” —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Democratic Capitalism

I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all. In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Action

The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness... But to make a man act [he must have] the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

Churches

[In the] higher Christian churches… they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm

Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Living Law

The recognition and integration of extralegal property rights [in the Homestead Act] was a key element in the United States becoming the most important market economy and producer of capital in the world.
Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital

mysql close 0