TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| Thirty Years After Thatcher | Specter, Souter, Who Cares? |
by Christopher Chantrill
April 30, 2009 at 11:09 am
EVERYONE on the right has got their knickers in a twist over Sen Check Schumers (D-NY) remarks on the Rachel Maddow show. She had him on to discuss the holdups to Obama nominees on Capitol Hill. Republican senators are forcing 60 vote majorities on all the nominees, or at least thats what Rachel and Chuck would like you to think.
You can see where Chuck Schumer is coming from. He wants to move a couple of the moderate Republican senators off dead center. So he makes Point One: The Reagan Years Are Over.
The world has changed. The old Reagan philosophy which served them well politically from 1980 to about 2004 and 2006 is over. But the hard right which still believes when the federal government moves, chop off its hands, still believes that, you know, traditional values kind of arguments and strong foreign policy, all that is over.
Oh yeah? If only! If only more that 0.75 percent of the hard right believed in chopping off the hands of the Federal government! Now we get to Point Two: Come On You Guys, Get On the Bus, or how to bully a few Republican senators to vote for Obama nominees
But there are 10 or 12 what youd call mainstream conservatives, people like Dick Lugar who supports Chris Hill, for instance, people like Lamar Alexander or George Voinovich. And the question is are they going to continue to march totally in line with the hard right even though I think in their hearts they know it is wrong or break on occasional issues?
You see, President Obama is talking bipartisanship, according to Chuck, so sooner or later these chaps are going to have to move.
So what we have here is a pure tactical move by Chuck Schumer, an attempt to bully potentially wavering senators into line. So he just picked a couple of stale political talking points out of the air with which to make his point.
Chuck Schumer knows better. After all, he is the masterful political tactician who has been recruiting family-values candidates to run as Democrats in Republican-leaning congressional districts and getting pretty good results.
The crunch was always going to come when the Democrats were back in power. What would these conservative Democrats do once a liberal president backed by a liberal Congress? What would voters think once liberal policies started getting enacted on the Hill?
So lets not listen to what Chuck Schumer says. Lets watch what he does. If Chuck Schumer was busily recruiting family-values candidates in the mid 2000s and if Candidate Obama ran as a man who talked a lot about his faith and his values, well, they are telling us something.
They are telling us that Democrats are going to experience some heavy going in the years immediately ahead if they think that traditional-values politics is dead.
Pace the feminists, this family-values stuff is all about women. Men dont really care about family values, not unless they are carefully taught. But it is women who care about family. They care about babies, they care about loved ones. They worry about their aging mothers. But women dont get the space to do their caring unless theres a pretty strong family structure in place.
Democrats succeeded in persuading a generation of women to abandon the hearth and home. Government could do just as well as mothers, they said. In fact, government with its helping professionals could do better. But the daughters of that generation are now in their young adulthood. They know the cost of women who leave the care of their families to the government.
Democrats ignore this fact at their peril.
Sphere: Related Content |Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
Civil Societya complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churchesbuilds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust
Tear down theory, poetic systems… No more rules, no more models… Genius conjures up
rather than learns… Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable...
[1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006
At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says we should....
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
mysql close 0
©2007 Christopher Chantrill