home  |  book  |  blogs  |   RSS  |  contact  |
  An American Manifesto
Wednesday May 23, 2012 
by Christopher Chantrill Follow chrischantrill on Twitter

TOP NAV

Home

Blogs

Opeds

Articles

Bio

Contact

BOOK

Manifesto

Sample

Faith

Education

Mutual aid

Law

Books

BLOGS 12

May 2012

Apr 2012

Mar 2012

Feb 2012

Jan 2012

BLOGS 11

Dec 2011

Nov 2011

Oct 2011

Sep 2011

Aug 2011

Jul 2011

Jun 2011

May 2011

Apr 2011

Mar 2011

Feb 2011

Jan 2011

BLOGS 10

Dec 2010

Nov 2010

Oct 2010

Sep 2010

Aug 2010

Jul 2010

Jun 2010

May 2010

Apr 2010

Mar 2010

Feb 2010

Jan 2010

BLOGS 09

Dec 2009

Nov 2009

Oct 2009

Sep 2009

Aug 2009

Jul 2009

Jun 2009

May 2009

Apr 2009

Mar 2009

Feb 2009

Jan 2009

BLOGS 08

Dec 2008

Nov 2008

Oct 2008

Sep 2008

Aug 2008

Jul 2008

Jun 2008

May 2008

Apr 2008

Mar 2008

Feb 2008

Jan 2008

BLOGS 07

Dec 2007

Nov 2007

Oct 2007

Sep 2007

Aug 2007

Jul 2007

Jun 2007

May 2007

Apr 2007

Mar 2007

Feb 2007

Jan 2007

BLOGS 06

Dec 2006

Nov 2006

Oct 2006

Sep 2006

Aug 2006

Jul 2006

Jun 2006

May 2006

Apr 2006

Mar 2006

Feb 2006

Jan 2006

BLOGS 05

Dec 2005

Nov 2005

Oct 2005

Sep 2005

Aug 2005

Jul 2005

Jun 2005

May 2005

Apr 2005

Mar 2005

Feb 2005

Jan 2005

BLOGS 04

Dec 2004

Thirty Years After Thatcher Specter, Souter, Who Cares?

print view

Schmers "Family Values" Remarks

by Christopher Chantrill
April 30, 2009 at 11:09 am

EVERYONE on the right has got their knickers in a twist over Sen Check Schumer’s (D-NY) remarks on the Rachel Maddow show. She had him on to discuss the holdups to Obama nominees on Capitol Hill. Republican senators are forcing 60 vote majorities on all the nominees, or at least that’s what Rachel and Chuck would like you to think.

You can see where Chuck Schumer is coming from. He wants to move a couple of the moderate Republican senators off dead center. So he makes Point One: The Reagan Years Are Over.

The world has changed. The old Reagan philosophy which served them well politically from 1980 to about 2004 and 2006 is over. But the hard right which still believes when the federal government moves, chop off its hands, still believes that, you know, traditional values kind of arguments and strong foreign policy, all that is over.

Oh yeah? If only! If only more that 0.75 percent of the hard right believed in chopping off the hands of the Federal government! Now we get to Point Two: Come On You Guys, Get On the Bus, or how to bully a few Republican senators to vote for Obama nominees

But there are 10 or 12 what you‘d call mainstream conservatives, people like Dick Lugar who supports Chris Hill, for instance, people like Lamar Alexander or George Voinovich. And the question is are they going to continue to march totally in line with the hard right even though I think in their hearts they know it is wrong or break on occasional issues?

You see, President Obama is talking bipartisanship, according to Chuck, so sooner or later these chaps are going to have to move.

So what we have here is a pure tactical move by Chuck Schumer, an attempt to bully potentially wavering senators into line. So he just picked a couple of stale political talking points out of the air with which to make his point.

Chuck Schumer knows better. After all, he is the masterful political tactician who has been recruiting family-values candidates to run as Democrats in Republican-leaning congressional districts and getting pretty good results.

The crunch was always going to come when the Democrats were back in power. What would these conservative Democrats do once a liberal president backed by a liberal Congress?  What would voters think once liberal policies started getting enacted on the Hill?

So let’s not listen to what Chuck Schumer says. Let’s watch what he does. If Chuck Schumer was busily recruiting family-values candidates in the mid 2000s and if Candidate Obama ran as a man who talked a lot about his faith and his values, well, they are telling us something.

They are telling us that Democrats are going to experience some heavy going in the years immediately ahead if they think that traditional-values politics is dead.

Pace the feminists, this family-values stuff is all about women. Men don’t really care about family values, not unless they are carefully taught. But it is women who care about family. They care about babies, they care about loved ones. They worry about their aging mothers. But women don’t get the space to do their caring unless there’s a pretty strong family structure in place.

Democrats succeeded in persuading a generation of women to abandon the hearth and home. Government could do just as well as mothers, they said.  In fact, government with its helping professionals could do better. But the daughters of that generation are now in their young adulthood.  They know the cost of women who leave the care of their families to the government.

Democrats ignore this fact at their peril.

Sphere: Related Content |

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.


 TAGS


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust


Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems… No more rules, no more models… Genius conjures up rather than learns… ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy


Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006


China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing


Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit


Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity


US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


mysql close 0

 

©2007 Christopher Chantrill