Democrats Pretzel Patriotism - Road to the Middle Class

THE FUSS over Rush Limbaugh and the “phoney soldiers” (is it phoney or phony?) flap is all about patriotism and the questioning thereof. Jonah Goldberg gets deep into the subject.

[L]iberals routinely and righteously condemn the “questioning” of anyone’s patriotism — until they have a chance to do it themselves. For example, in the debates over the formation of the Department of Homeland Security and the passage of Patriot Act, Democrats accused George Bush and the GOP leadership of questioning Democrats’ patriotism.

Or John Kerry before the Council on Foreign Relations:

“I know what the Bush apologists will say to this — that it is unpatriotic to question, to criticize and to call for change.”

You are not allowed to call Democrats unpatriotic, and generally speaking, Republicans don’t. They merely hint at it. But the rules don’t apply to Democrats. Writes Goldberg:

Sen. Bob Graham called Bush’s war policy “anti-patriotic at the core.” Kerry dubbed Bush’s “creed of greed” — you guessed it — “unpatriotic.”

John Kerry? Calling someone else unpatriotic? Sure, and he’s not the only one.

And now with Rush Limbaugh, Democrats, starting with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, are lining up to call the radio host “unpatriotic” and do whatever they can to discredit him.

The truth is, of course, that Democrats are caught in a bind here. For decades they have been mocking the idea of patriotism and nationalism. They have been urging us to move on beyond the primitive nation state to a global world order. They are all in favor of things like the United Nations and the European Union.

Their adepts, the left-wing netroots, are fully invested in the idea. They went to college and listened to their liberal college professors and they agree with their teachers. Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. They don’t understand why the Democrats don’t stand up for their principles.

The reason, dear netroots, is that they can’t. The overwhelming majority of Americans are patriotic and they believe in the nation state. Democrats can tell each other in the faculty lounge that patriotism is a form of bigotry. They can even say it in liberal precincts like San Francisco and Seattle. But they can’t say that on the campaign trail if they want to be elected to state-wide or national office. You just can’t get elected to national political office in America by trashing America.

In fact, the Democrats tried it once, in the aftermath of the Vietnam War. It didn’t work too well. President Ronald Reagan was the result.

Since then Democrats have twisted themselves in knots with Pretzel Patriotism. They demand that nobody questions their patriotism. That’s because they can’t afford to let that happen. They have to come up with weasel notions like Howard Zinn’s: “Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.”

But when it comes to patriotic Americans like Rush Limbaugh, hey, it’s Katie bar the door. Take anything he says out of context and blast him for assaulting the patriotism of the anti-war crowd.

But wait a minute. I thought the Peace people had got beyond primitive notions like the nation state.

Sphere: Related Content |

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

TAGS

Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.” —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Civil Society

“Civil Society”—a complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churches—builds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust

Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems� No more rules, no more models� Genius conjures up rather than learns� ” —Victor Hugo
C�sar Gra�a, Bohemian versus Bourgeois

Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990

Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing

Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit

Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

mysql close 0