TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| Bush Prepares the Domestic Battlefield | Fighting for Kids in Utah |
by Christopher Chantrill
September 12, 2007 at 10:32 am
CONSERVATIVES and Republicans keep hoping that liberals will actually admit that supply-side economics works, that is that low tax rates and limited government is the best prescription for prosperity.
But liberals just dont want to accept of grace and love, spurning the offer of friendship made by Sir Walter Blunt to Harry Percy in Henry IV Part One.
In fact Jonathan Chait, Senior Editor of The New Republic has just published a book rejecting the whole supply-side deal. Its called The Big Con: The True Story of How Washington Got Hoodwinked and Hijacked by Crackpot Economics, and it argues that Arthur Laffer (of the curve) was a lightweight, Jude Wanniski (of the Wall Street Journal edit page) was a crackpot, and George Gilder (of Wealth and Poverty) was a blind (and misogynistic) enthusiast.
Well, enough with pulling our punches, lets get Chaits own words from anexcept to The Big Con from The New Republic.
American politics has been hijacked by a tiny coterie of right-wing economic extremists, some of them ideological zealots, others merely greedy, a few of them possibly insane.
To add to the fun, Chait and Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, have been trading barbs in the online New Republic:
Of course, Chait is right. Arthur Laffer is no Milton Friedman; Jude Wanniski was weird, and George Gilder enjoys bucking the liberal consensus. And its true that the advocates for supply-side economics oversold their product. Thats what advocates usually do.
The big question is whether liberals are ready to concede that they ought to back off, just a little,their philosophy of governance by program and subsidy and endlessly mucking around with the tax code.
That is really the argument of supply-side economics. It says that you can use government to reward your supporters and punish your opponents: politics as usual. Boys will be boys.
But you ought to understand that when you erect confiscatory tax rates and huge subsidies that you distort the economy and reduce the prosperity of ordinary Americans.
You ought to confront, for instance, that when you send huge amounts of money to the poor it reduces their work effort and it devastates their families. And that is not just an economic issue. It is a moral issue.
And it is true. Supply-side economics devoured American Politicsat least as liberals had known it.
Sphere: Related Content |Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
Civil Societya complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churchesbuilds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust
Tear down theory, poetic systems… No more rules, no more models… Genius conjures up
rather than learns… Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable...
[1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006
At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says we should....
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
mysql close 0
©2007 Christopher Chantrill