TOP NAV
BOOK
BLOGS 12
BLOGS 11
BLOGS 10
BLOGS 09
BLOGS 08
BLOGS 07
BLOGS 06
BLOGS 05
BLOGS 04
| A Look at the "New Anger" | The Economist Discovers Pentecostalism |
by Christopher Chantrill
January 02, 2007 at 8:14 am
BACK WHEN THE Brits declared war on their selective secondary school system Prime Minister Harold Wilson declared that the objective of the new comprehensive schools was "grammar schools for all," as Eric Anderson reports.
Back in the 1960s, you see, it was an article of faith in left-wing circles that the “11-plus” exam, which controlled access to selective secondary schools, was an abomination that preserved the class system. Abolish the 11-plus, they claimed, and you would end centuries of privilege.
It hasn’t turned out that way. Now that Britain has a uniform system of comprehensive secondary schools, the number of poor kids making it into university has gone down.
The old selective system allowed bright young children from deprived homes to vault into another world, a world in which academic study was as natural as taking a shower every day. Instead of the envious cultural bias against academic studies that prevails in lower-class culture, they now lived in a world that celebrated learning and scholarship. In the comprehensive school system, there is no escape from the lower-class culture.
There has been, inadvertently, a test of the new comprehensive school system. By an accident of fate the schools of Northern Ireland were not converted to the comprehensive system. To this day the Northern Irish have preserved the old system of selective grammar schools. The result, writes Anderson:
Northern Ireland... provides the model for what a selective system can achieve for social mobility. There, 42 per cent of university entrants come from less privileged backgrounds, compared to only 28 per cent in England.
Here in the United States, school reform comes under the rubric of “choice.” Let parents send their children to the school of their choice; that is the cry.
But it is amazing how people, even here, seem to accept almost without comment the idea that the government ought to be able to control the education of children.
Actually, most of us have no problem with the government controlling the education of other-peoples’ children.
We only draw the line when the government decides what is best for our own children.
Sphere: Related Content |Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.
But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie
that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.
Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison
Civil Societya complex welter of intermediate institutions, including businesses, voluntary associations, educational institutions, clubs, unions, media, charities, and churchesbuilds, in turn, on the family, the primary instrument by which people are socialized into their culture and given the skills that allow them to live in broader society and through which the values and knowledge of that society are transmitted across the generations.
Francis Fukuyama, Trust
Tear down theory, poetic systems… No more rules, no more models… Genius conjures up
rather than learns… Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois
We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.
E. G. West, Education and the State
When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of agesthey seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990
When we received Christ, Phil added, all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh
A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is merely relative, is asking you not to believe him. So dont.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy
As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable...
[1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006
At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing
But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family.
Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit
Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says we should....
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity
Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism
mysql close 0
©2007 Christopher Chantrill